Some mosses are quite boring cannon runners, but others look like disfigured iron spiders or steam locomotives with legs – and the Russians (in the local alternative universe “Rusveti”) even pamper a completely absurd moss with two gigantic scythes instead of hands. Iron Harvest really makes the most of this beautiful megalomaniac, hair-aesthetic. Just everything the same.īut, of course, this is not the case with the old one, because no matter how much you may like your Panthers and Tigers and Shermans, their frontal attack with sheer visual impact absolutely cannot match when a giant robot steps on you in one step. And yes, they all have weaker rear armor, so you have to go around them to achieve the highest destructive effect. Instead of self-propelled artillery, there is a giant cannon that walks on its own. Instead of heavy tanks, there are fortified stomping monsters. Instead of light, low-armored fast tanks, there are lighter, low-armored fast mosses. Honestly, what is to the game is not such a change. Instead of tanks, there are moss, giant metal suits, into which brave pilots are tuned. Veterans will be familiar with everything: drastically limited base construction, emphasis on combat, not production and economics, infantry organized into cohesive units relying on cover behind obstacles, special abilities and bypass maneuvers, and of course tanks, moving bastions sowing death that are capable of devastating everything that comes under their cannon – even the coveted stone wall that protects your infantry from enemy bullets. Iron Harvest is, or would like to be, the kind of Company of Heroes 3 in a different jacket. Although the cult World War II strategy came out in 2006, it could be argued quite successfully that no one has surpassed its addictive mix of clever infantry tactics and massive tank attacks since then, including the second part from the Eastern Front. Winters is in this case Company of Heroes. And as for mechanics… Why rediscover America when one can be inspired by Lieutenant Winters? They had a solid theme: The beautifully unique universe of the 1920+ painter Jakub Różalský, where in the fields cultivated by poor peasants, the grain crushes the steel legs of giant moss.
Iron harvest reviews how to#
This truth was probably followed by the developers from the German studio King Art when they figured out how to process it Iron Harvest. There is simply nothing wrong with being inspired by a foreign, successful military plan or copying it directly if it leads to a successful result. To this day, they are also learning about Napoleon and Hannibal, so that one day they will be more effective officers.
The campaign is good and all, but multiplayer is where Iron Harvest shines.At the West Point Military Academy, cadets study the 101st Airborne Division’s attack on Brécourt Manor to learn a perfect example of how to lead an infantry unit against a stronger enemy. Coming from other competitive RTS games, I find the game to be equally addicting. Infantry/hero rushing, late-game play, barbed wire cheesing – everything I’ve tried so far has shown potential. There is no one path to victory, with the game allowing for plenty of strategic individualization. Regarding my own experience, I’ve been in love with the multiplayer. All three factions were used at the highest level, though the grand finals featured two Polanian players. HeroMarine, ToD, RotterdaM, and DeMusliM each made strong debuts in the new RTS. And I’m not the only one who thinks so ESL sanctioned an Iron Harvest open beta pre-season tournament event, and StarCraft 2 professionals and casters alike reached the top eight.
That said, it’s quite impressive to see Iron Harvest launch with the Rusviets, Polanians, and Saxony Empire each balanced reasonably well against each other. Competitively balancing unique factions is a massive undertaking in the RTS genre.
0 kommentar(er)
